Update and case note on Hely-Hutchinson

The issues surrounding the Mansworth v Jelley losses plow on. In the case of HMRC v Hely-Hutchinson, the taxpayer claims that he is entitled to the benefit of HMRC guidance which provided that losses could be claimed as a result of the 2003 Mansworth v Jelley case. HMRC’s response is that the guidance was wrong; that it is lawful for the body to correct that mistake and that the taxpayer should not accordingly be entitled to the benefit of the erroneous guidance. The taxpayer succeeded before the High Court, as I explained in a lengthy case note for the British Tax Review. The result was reversed however in the Court of Appeal. A short case note that I wrote on the Court of Appeal judgment has now been published by the Cambridge Law Journal and is available to read here (a pre-publication version is available here). The taxpayer has sought to appeal that judgment and the decision on permission to appeal is still outstanding (the latest permission to appeal results from May to June 2018 do not contain the case).

Unknown's avatar

About Dr Stephen Daly

Reader (Associate Professor) in Tax Law at King's College London and General Editor of the British Tax Review.
This entry was posted in Tax Law. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Update and case note on Hely-Hutchinson

  1. Pingback: Hely-Hutchinson and the end to the Mansworth v Jelley affair | taxatlincolnox

Leave a comment